|
|
|
|
|
ProQuest
User Base
Survey
Results
Download
Now (95K Acrobat
.pdf file)
|
|
.
|
|
apq
|
ProQuest's focus is on the human intangibles relevant to financial decision-making. Our mission is to develop tools that will asses these intangibles in terms that are meaningful to individuals and their advisers.
Our first tool assesses personal financial risk tolerance.
Four years in development, ProQuest's Risk Profiling system is, to our knowledge, the world's first web-based system to meet internationally accepted psychometric standards The ProQuest system offers previously unattainable levels of validity, reliability and accuracy in risk tolerance assessment.
It is an inexpensive, quick and user-friendly way to gain a more insightful understanding (in plain-English) of financial attitudes, values, motivations preferences and experiences, and to meet common and statutory law 'know the client' duty-of-care obligations.
|
|
|
 |
What is ProQuest?
|
|
|
|
ProQuest is
not a 'portfolio-picker' questionnaire!
In recent years it has become commonplace for advisers to deal with determining asset allocations in a single step by way of scored questionnaires, variously
called 'Risk Profilers' or 'Investor Profilers'. These combine the client’s answers to (usually) less than ten questions about
their age, experience, attitudes to risk, time horizon and the like, to select one of a range of "profiles" each of which
is associated with an asset allocation.
In addition to having been developed without regard to the technical disciplines of test construction, these
'portfolio-pickers' suffer from the following conceptual flaws:
-
because of the inclusion of situational questions, risk
tolerance per se is not assessed (often despite claims to the
contrary),
-
the return required to meet the client’s goals is not
assessed,
- the existence of any mismatch between risk tolerance and
the risk inherent in the return required is not identified
so that neither the client nor adviser is in a position to know
whether the asset allocation chosen will meet the client’s
goals or is within the client’s risk tolerance, and
- if there is a mismatch, the scoring algorithm resolves it by
a compromise based on the test designer’s view of the values the client would bring to such a decision (rather than
the client’s actual values) and without considering the alternatives.
Portfolio-pickers
dis-empower both adviser and client. It would be difficult to argue that a client gave informed
consent to the implementation of an asset allocation chosen by a portfolio-picker. And it certainly could not be said that
the adviser had made an assessment of the client’s risk tolerance.
Portfolio-pickers were never an ideal solution for
what we readily acknowledge is a difficult set of problems. However, now that scientific risk profiling can be coupled
with modelling software to produce a demonstrably superior result, their continued use is difficult to justify.
Unfortunately, because portfolio-pickers are commonly (mis)labelled as Risk Profilers, many
have assumed, at least initially, that the ProQuest Risk Profiling system is just another portfolio-picker.
ProQuest Takes 'Risk Profiling' Back to First Principles
ProQuest went back to first principles by recognising that the financial planning process required, as
a fundamental building block, a valid and reliable assessment of
risk tolerance.
Indeed,
Harold Evensky
describes an
understanding of risk tolerance
as "...the
single most important factor in guiding clients towards a
successful investment program."
In 1995, Geoff
Davey and Paul Resnik, ProQuest's founders, were members of an
FPA sub-committee which conducted and international search for,
and review of, profiling systems. While no suitable systems were
found, it was clear from overseas research that risk tolerance is a
psychological trait, i.e. a relatively enduring way one individual varies from another, and that the assessment
disciplines required were those of psychometric testing.
ProQuest was
formed and the development process began. With the assistance of the University of New South
Wales’ Applied Psychology Unit, we completed the technical development of the testing instrument some
24 months later. More recently, using our database of 6000 completed profiles and extensive analysis of the historical performance
characteristics of representative asset allocations, we have developed a methodology for
expressing an investor's risk profile in terms of an asset
allocation consistent with their risk tolerance.
In
order to distinguish what we do from "portfolio
picker" risk profiling, we refer to our process as
"scientific" risk profiling.
What does a scientific risk
profiler actually do?
A scientific risk
profiler mirrors what many advisers aim to do, either
intuitively or by using non-scientifically derived
questionnaires, namely
- form a view as
to the client's risk tolerance, by conducting a
question-and-answer discussion about the client's attitudes,
values, preferences and experiences in matters involving
financial risk,
-
feed
back to the client a written summary of this view and, if required, amend the
summary to reflect the client's feedback (in order
to obtain the client's confirmation that the adviser's understanding is
accurate and that the adviser may rely on it.)
- consciously or
sub-consciously, make a norm-referenced rating of the
client's risk tolerance using as norms those derived from
the adviser's experience, viz "This client is
Low/High/Average, etc. compared to my other clients."
The ProQuest
system follows that process with these key differences:
- The questions
have been tested for validity and reliability and cover a
broader range of topics than would typically be covered by a
adviser.
- The questions
are in jargon-free, plain English that has been tested for
understandability and answerability, and hence
explanation/clarification by the adviser is unnecessary.
- Because the
questions are asked in a controlled manner without the
adviser being involved, interaction with the adviser cannot
unintentionally influence the outcome.
- The summary is
produced automatically in a structured format by way of a
plain English risk profile report.
- The
norms-referenced rating is calculated statistically with a
known, high level of accuracy against an adult population
sample.
Importantly,
scientific risk profiling does not replace discussion between
adviser and client. Rather, the completed questionnaire and the
risk profile report become inputs to that discussion. This
approach enables an in-depth understanding to be reached far
more accurately and quickly than by discussion alone.
By clearly articulating the client’s risk tolerance in
terms that are meaningful to adviser and client the ProQuest system empowers both
adviser and client:
- clients are better able to give the
adviser clear instructions
as to the level of risk they are willing to accept, and
- advisers are better able to explain and illustrate the
practicalities of financial alternatives in the context of the client’s
needs and wants.
Would you like to
add your feedback? Visit our Feedback
page.

|
|
 |
Our
Core Proposition on Risk Profiling
|
|
|
|
ProQuest believes
that advisers have a professional, legal and ethical obligation
to form a view as to
their client’s risk tolerance and to take that view into
account when giving advice. For those who share this belief, the
issue becomes how best to discharge that obligation.
In "An
Adviser's Obligation in Establishing a Client's Risk Tolerance"
the Argyle Partnerships' Peter Bobbin gives a lawyer's
perspective on the nature and scope of the adviser's obligation.
In discharging
it, we believe that the best starting point is an objective
assessment of the client's risk tolerance made by way of a
scientific risk profile. A risk profile, of itself, is not the
determining factor in any aspect of a financial plan.
However, if a recommendation involves a level of risk beyond that which the
client would normally be willing to accept, we believe that the client should be aware
of the mismatch and either consent to it or be given other alternatives.
Without this awareness, no client can be said to have given
informed consent to implementation of their financial plan.
Informed consent
does not mean that investment risk cannot exceed risk tolerance.
But rather that, if it does, the client has been made explicitly
aware (in language they can understand - such as the
plain-English of the ProQuest Risk Tolerance report) that it does, and
of the possible consequences thereof.
You can read more
about ProQuest's core proposition on Risk Profiling in our 'Open
Letter to FPA Members', published in the October 2000
edition of Financial Planning Magazine:

Download 'Open
Letter to FPA Members'
Would
you like to add your feedback? Visit our Feedback
page.

|
|
 |
ProQuest and Psychometric
Standards
|
|
|
| Psychometrics, a
blend of psychology and statistics, is the science of test
construction. it is an established discipline which provides
standards against which tests can be evaluated.
Advisers face several key
issues when considering how to best develop an understanding of
the risk tolerance of their clients.
What is risk tolerance?
Why is it important that advisers understand the risk
tolerance of clients?
How should advisers go about obtaining an understanding of
their client's risk tolerance?
What should advisers look for in a risk tolerance test?
The University of Queensland report "Measuring
Risk Tolerance: A Psychological Perspective"
raises and answers these important questions.
In choosing the
best test of risk tolerance, many questions need to be
asked. How is risk tolerance defined in the test?
How has the test been trialed? How and when is the test to
be used? These questions and many others raised here
should be answered in the manual that accompanies the
test. Or, providers of the test must have experts available to
answer such questions.
This paper outlines for advisers the nature
of risk tolerance, and identifies some key issues in
choosing a valid and reliable test instrument.
The paper is
authored by Victor J Callan, Professor and Head of the Graduate
School of Management at the University of Queensland, and
Malcolm Johnson, Lecturer in the Graduate School of Management
at the University of Queensland.

|
|
 |
What
Industry Leaders and Your Colleagues Are Saying About ProQuest
|
|
|
|
National (and
international) industry leaders are participating in the current
discussion about the role of risk profiling in contemporary
financial planning. Here we present the views of five of these
industry leaders:
"I have
had the opportunity for many detailed discussions with the
creators of the ProQuest Personal Financial Risk Profiling
system and I have reviewed their work as it's progressed. Based
on that experience, I have the greatest respect for the end
result.
I believe that ProQuest is a world leader in the development of
fundamentally sound, yet practical tools that enable
practitioners to address the single most important factor in
guiding clients towards a successful investment program - their
personal risk profile. I look forward to having the opportunity
of incorporating the ProQuest system into our practice."
 |
THE FUND MANAGER: Lester Wills,
Mercantile Mutual Funds Management. |
"We are
pleased to be taking a leading role in the provision of an
easily-accessible new Australian technology that converges on so
many aspects of the current financial planning agenda: improved
compliance, superior 'know the client' capability, and accurate
needs-based planning. ProQuest adds value to the MercAdviser
community."
 |
THE SOFTWARE DEVELOPER:
Robert Green, Vision FPS |
"We often get comment from planners who use both ProQuest
and VisiPlan describing the powerful impact that they achieve in
their client meetings by graphically demonstrating the interaction
of risk tolerance, projected returns and the long term result on
the client's savings, spending and net wealth."
 |
THE
RESEARCHER:
Graham Rich, Morningstar |
"In
Morningstar's opinion, ProQuest has set a new international
benchmark for investor risk profiling. It is unparalleled in its
ability to comprehensively reflect investor attitudes to risk.
Morningstar is committed to integrating ProQuest into its range of
portfolio building services.
Without a clear and accurate picture of their risk profiles, it is
unlikely that investors will be as comfortable with the investment
results achieved, or the paths taken to get there. In any event,
an adviser is obviously engaging in a high risk activity by not
pursuing a quality risk profiling approach."
THE COMPLIANCE SERVICES PROVIDER: Adam Tayler, THP Services
"Having completed over thirteen thousand adviser compliance reviews, the
inescapable conclusion is that current methods of assessing client risk
tolerance need much improvement. All advisers would benefit from having a
systematic and documented approach to risk profiling."
And what your
colleagues are saying...
"ProQuest evidences to clients that we are up with
modern planning techniques and have a genuine interest in knowing about them."
Fred Barnes, Succession Planning
"Because we
forward the ProQuest questionnaire to our prospective clients
prior to the first meeting, clients feel that we’re serious
planners and are more connected to us."
Rick Maggi, Westmount Securities
"Each question helps focus the client on an issue.
It makes our job easier when explaining risk."
Laura Menschik, Millennium Financial Services
"ProQuest improves client communication and
subsequent advice."
Murray McLean, Ebony Rose Financial Strategists
"The ProQuest system is comprehensive and
user-friendly, and easier to understand than others available. Its computer-generated report provides us,
and our clients, with a plain English written record of their risk tolerance. We are confident of gaining a
better understanding of how our clients look at investment risks and it is easily adaptable to our
asset allocation process."
John Keeble, CIS Financial Services
"ProQuest has helped my staff understand risk profiling and why we need to do it."
Greg Stevens, Greg Stevens and Associates
"When used with existing clients, ProQuest can help them to lift their exposure to shares for longer-term
returns."
Anthony Grant, Salomon Smith Barney
"ProQuest enhances a disciplined compliance
process, making other staff aware of risk."
Anthony Jones, Templetons Financial Planning
"ProQuest is a more systematised way of doing risk
profiling on clients."
Chris Bowyer, Future Strategies
“ProQuest
reduces the subjectivity of assessing an individual’s risk
profile, confirms that risk tolerance was discussed and records
the results. ProQuest assists our firm in reducing the guesswork
involved in analysing an individual’s risk profile.”
Suzanne Baldry, Baldry Financial Planning
“ProQuest risk
profiling gives our clients a thorough analysis of how they feel
about risk. Our clients therefore feel more comfortable with our
classification of their profile. ProQuest has helped us lift the
standard of our professional advice and service.”
Charlie Sorel, Hillross

|
|
|