About Me Reviews Site Map Glossary Foreword Books Top Link Bar

Reviews

 

Home

 

 

blog stats
Reviews & Reactions

 

This page is dedicated to reviews, reactions, comments, suggestions and criticisms I received, that authors approved for publishing.

 

There was a review related to the first edition, I recently became aware of. It was in Current Opinion in Neurobiology included in article Cognitive neuroscience - A selection of World Wide Web sites relevant to papers published in this issue of Current Opinion in Neurobiology (Volume 11, Issue 2, April 2001, Page 145) by Martin G. Todman (Laboratory of Neuroendocrinology, The Babraham Institute, Cambridge CB2 4AT, UK) and Philip J. Benson (Department of Psychology, William Guild Building, King's College, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen AB24 2UB, UK). It was placed as second of nine reviews.

"Imagination is greater than knowledge"

http://users.zipwold.com.au/~damir/

Nicely presented home pages written by Damir Ibrisimovic expressing his thoughts and concepts of objectivity and subjectivity and how this may relate to the world and what is really "out there". As yet, the opinions expressed in these pages are not referenced by actual scientific discovery.

Copyright 2001, reprinted with permission from Elsevier

The first review I received, updated since, was mailed to me on 8  December 2005:

Dear Mr. Ibrisimovic,

Thank you for sending me your 45-page paper "Imagination is Greater than Knowledge," taken from your Web site. I read the paper in its entirety over the last several months and found it interesting, often extremely so, intelligently and often persuasively argued by a bright and articulate writer. Beyond this general remark, I cannot go much further because I lack specific expertise in experimental psychology, neuroscience, metaphysics, epistemology, the philosophy of science, and the philosophy of mind and your paper is at the intersection of these, among other disciplines.

That said, much of what you write appears to be reasonable conclusions based on solid scientific research. Libet's findings (Benjamin Libet, "Unconscious Cerebral Initiative and the Role of Conscious Will in Voluntary Action," Behavioral and Brain Sciences 8(1995): 529-566) cited on .8 seconds delay before voluntary action can be carried out, with only .3 seconds of this time available to our conscious minds, unquestionably have major implications for virtually every discipline. Some of these implications and some qualifications on their import are discussed in Benjamin Libet, Neurophysiology of Consciousness: Selected Papers of Benjamin Libet (Boston: Birkhauser, 1993), Epilogue I.
 

Wish best wishes,

Joseph S. Fulda, C.S.E., Ph.D.

 

The first comment I received was on 9 April 2003:

Dear Mr. Ibrisimovic,

Thank you for bringing our attention to your stimulating website. The picture you are painting is indeed refreshing, but while it is quite different from that painted by the prevailing world view of the Western world, it bears delightful similarities to our own here at PEAR. If you are not already familiar with our program, I invite you to look at our web site, including some of the papers that can be downloaded from its publication page. In particular, I think you will find the one entitled "Science of the Subjective" (PDF) strongly supportive of and resonant with your own approach.

I applaud your efforts to pull all of these diverse threads into a comprehensive tapestry and wish you every success in your desire to share it with others.

With all best wishes,

Brenda Dunne
PEAR Laboratory Manager
 

 

Copyright 2000-2005. The concepts expressed on these pages, unless attributed to others, may not be used without explicit permission from Damir Ibrisimovic.